Not really much argument here, although I'd flip Prime Time and Favre. No argument for #1. 8)
http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap2000000361846/article/emmitt-smith-deion-sanders-among-top-nfl-players-of-the-90s (http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap2000000361846/article/emmitt-smith-deion-sanders-among-top-nfl-players-of-the-90s)
no surprise, I agree with you norm, I would flip Prime and Favre. It's hard to see Rice at 3, but when you see Emmitt at 2...well, its almost like a 2a 2b in random order to me and of course, zero argument with Sanders at 1.
I agree with the author on Aikman/Young. Young was the more talented QB and had the numbers. Both had supporting talent; coaches and players. Aikman did do better in the big games, but all the way through, yea, Id have to go with whats on the list.
I'd try to find a higher spot for Thomas though, just no where to put him. I always think of how Eddie Van Halen expanded on what Henrix did; same with Thomas who picked up where LT left off.
thanks for posting
Quote from: TheNorm on June 28, 2014, 01:21:11 PM
Not really much argument here, although I'd flip Prime Time and Favre. No argument for #1. 8)
http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap2000000361846/article/emmitt-smith-deion-sanders-among-top-nfl-players-of-the-90s (http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap2000000361846/article/emmitt-smith-deion-sanders-among-top-nfl-players-of-the-90s)
Make that three. Just what I was thinking.
Cornelius Bennett? 5 pro bowls 4x all pro, 5 super bowls (4 bills and 1 falcons)